Categories: Art | Companies and deals | Design | Gadgets | Gaming | Hilarious | How to | Interesting sites | Technology | Tips&Tricks | Misc | Open Source | People | Science | Security&Privacy | Web 2.0 | Web marketing | Weird
Open Blog where you Submit, Vote and Read
Our content is based entirely on readers' submissions
read and Vote on recent items
Read the front page or the best rated articles
Hey, an intelligent response, but...
There are couple points to add.
While human caused global warming is a theory, the physics do add up. Green house gasses do heat the earth, and humans have contributed a significant amount them.
Also, a volcanic eruption isn't quit the same as contuous carbon dioxide emissions. The net effect of that volcano eruption was lowered global temps by about 1.2 degreed Celcius. Yet the current greenhouse gases are causing a net global warming.
Personally, I don't think it wise to assume our actions are NOT detrimental. While we may be comparitive to prairie dogs in Texas, we produce a LOT more toxic waste in comparison. You shouldn't use a bio-mass comparison, unless both produce proportionatly equivalent ammounts of greenhouse gases, ozone-depleting gases, non-biologically degradable waste, etc.
The ancient egyptians left us the pyriamids, what are we going to leave, mountains of diapers?